<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oregon Expands Abuse Definitions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://disabilityreviews.org/blog/2009/12/30/oregon-expands-abuse-definitions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://disabilityreviews.org/blog/2009/12/30/oregon-expands-abuse-definitions/</link>
	<description>Confronting Disability Discrimination</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 22:49:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Goode</title>
		<link>http://disabilityreviews.org/blog/2009/12/30/oregon-expands-abuse-definitions/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Goode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilityreviews.org/?p=134#comment-89</guid>
		<description>David,

I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David McDonald</title>
		<link>http://disabilityreviews.org/blog/2009/12/30/oregon-expands-abuse-definitions/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>David McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilityreviews.org/?p=134#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Interesting how they don&#039;t really talk about &quot;medical neglect&quot; in the revised statute. Far as I&#039;m concerned, the denial of medical treatment and/or medicine, or the neglect to facilitate someone getting screenings they need as they age are clear abandonment issues that will continue until addressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how they don&#8217;t really talk about &#8220;medical neglect&#8221; in the revised statute. Far as I&#8217;m concerned, the denial of medical treatment and/or medicine, or the neglect to facilitate someone getting screenings they need as they age are clear abandonment issues that will continue until addressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

