<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Disability Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://disabilityreviews.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://disabilityreviews.org</link>
	<description>Evaluating establishments</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 21:59:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on California Travel Advice by Disability Reviews &#187; Home of the $12.99 Soda</title>
		<link>http://disabilityreviews.org/blog/2009/08/26/california-travel-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Disability Reviews &#187; Home of the $12.99 Soda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 21:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilityreviews.org/?p=129#comment-116</guid>
		<description>[...] Of course, using it was risking a ticket. See California Travel Advice. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course, using it was risking a ticket. See California Travel Advice. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on California Travel Advice by Rex Goode</title>
		<link>http://disabilityreviews.org/blog/2009/08/26/california-travel-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Goode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilityreviews.org/?p=129#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Ace,

Thanks for your response. I read the federal law you cite and it seems you are right. 

How does that fit with this statement from California&#039;s website?

Travel parking placard for nonresidents who plan to travel in California and are a disabled person or disabled veteran. Valid for up to 90 days or the date noted by your licensed medical professional on the application, whichever is less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ace,</p>
<p>Thanks for your response. I read the federal law you cite and it seems you are right. </p>
<p>How does that fit with this statement from California&#8217;s website?</p>
<p>Travel parking placard for nonresidents who plan to travel in California and are a disabled person or disabled veteran. Valid for up to 90 days or the date noted by your licensed medical professional on the application, whichever is less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on California Travel Advice by Ace</title>
		<link>http://disabilityreviews.org/blog/2009/08/26/california-travel-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilityreviews.org/?p=129#comment-99</guid>
		<description>This is not correct - under federal law all states are required to recognize other states&#039; and countries&#039; placards.

23 C.F.R. PART 1235—UNIFORM SYSTEM FOR PARKING FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not correct &#8211; under federal law all states are required to recognize other states&#8217; and countries&#8217; placards.</p>
<p>23 C.F.R. PART 1235—UNIFORM SYSTEM FOR PARKING FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oregon Expands Abuse Definitions by Rex Goode</title>
		<link>http://disabilityreviews.org/blog/2009/12/30/oregon-expands-abuse-definitions/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Goode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilityreviews.org/?p=134#comment-89</guid>
		<description>David,

I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oregon Expands Abuse Definitions by David McDonald</title>
		<link>http://disabilityreviews.org/blog/2009/12/30/oregon-expands-abuse-definitions/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>David McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilityreviews.org/?p=134#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Interesting how they don&#039;t really talk about &quot;medical neglect&quot; in the revised statute. Far as I&#039;m concerned, the denial of medical treatment and/or medicine, or the neglect to facilitate someone getting screenings they need as they age are clear abandonment issues that will continue until addressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how they don&#8217;t really talk about &#8220;medical neglect&#8221; in the revised statute. Far as I&#8217;m concerned, the denial of medical treatment and/or medicine, or the neglect to facilitate someone getting screenings they need as they age are clear abandonment issues that will continue until addressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Parking Space Abuse by Disability Reviews &#187; California Travel Advice</title>
		<link>http://disabilityreviews.org/blog/2009/03/11/parking-space-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Disability Reviews &#187; California Travel Advice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilityreviews.org/?p=98#comment-75</guid>
		<description>[...] So, I spied an open disabled space that was big enough for my vehicle and fairly close to the door. I parked there and hung my permit from the rearview mirror. I got lucky, because I didn&#8217;t get cited. I think that is probably because enforcement in California is probably no better than in Oregon. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, I spied an open disabled space that was big enough for my vehicle and fairly close to the door. I parked there and hung my permit from the rearview mirror. I got lucky, because I didn&#8217;t get cited. I think that is probably because enforcement in California is probably no better than in Oregon. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Parking Space Abuse by Rex Goode</title>
		<link>http://disabilityreviews.org/blog/2009/03/11/parking-space-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Goode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilityreviews.org/?p=98#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Heidi, Thanks for your comment. I don&#039;t disagree, mostly. I consider myself to have a hidden disability. My arthritis pain comes and goes. Some days it&#039;s bad. Some days I don&#039;t even notice it.

In the incident I described, one of the three young people may have been disabled. I only use them as an example of what I believe to be a problem with abuse and the police&#039;s lack of interest in solving it.

Not long ago, I pulled up into a disabled space at a grocery store and was greeted by a man in an orange vest that said Portland Police on it. He asked me if the tag hanging from my mirror belonged to me.  He asked to see it. It satisfied him. He was out there awhile checking every car that parked in a disabled space. I watched for about thirty minutes while I leaned on a shopping cart. He wrote several tickets. Obviously, people are abusing it.

I know that this story goes against my original assertion that the police don&#039;t care. This man was not a regular officer. I talked to him for a few minutes. He&#039;s more or less a volunteer. I asked him if there was a similar program in my city, which neighbors Portland. He said that there is when there is a volunteer, which isn&#039;t that often. Enforcement happens, but not a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heidi, Thanks for your comment. I don&#8217;t disagree, mostly. I consider myself to have a hidden disability. My arthritis pain comes and goes. Some days it&#8217;s bad. Some days I don&#8217;t even notice it.</p>
<p>In the incident I described, one of the three young people may have been disabled. I only use them as an example of what I believe to be a problem with abuse and the police&#8217;s lack of interest in solving it.</p>
<p>Not long ago, I pulled up into a disabled space at a grocery store and was greeted by a man in an orange vest that said Portland Police on it. He asked me if the tag hanging from my mirror belonged to me.  He asked to see it. It satisfied him. He was out there awhile checking every car that parked in a disabled space. I watched for about thirty minutes while I leaned on a shopping cart. He wrote several tickets. Obviously, people are abusing it.</p>
<p>I know that this story goes against my original assertion that the police don&#8217;t care. This man was not a regular officer. I talked to him for a few minutes. He&#8217;s more or less a volunteer. I asked him if there was a similar program in my city, which neighbors Portland. He said that there is when there is a volunteer, which isn&#8217;t that often. Enforcement happens, but not a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Parking Space Abuse by Heidi</title>
		<link>http://disabilityreviews.org/blog/2009/03/11/parking-space-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 03:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilityreviews.org/?p=98#comment-65</guid>
		<description>I would be careful of assuming someone is not disabled based on their seemingly agile movements for the few seconds that you see them.  Several disabilities are &quot;invisible&quot; and may not be obvious when viewing someone for just a few seconds.  I myself have multiple sclerosis and use the handicap accessible parking spaces on a regular basis.  I&#039;m sure many people have seen me getting out of my car and thought I was parked illegally.  However, were I to park in a &quot;regular&quot; spot (perhaps several hundred feet further from the store entrance), the spasticity in my legs and continuous foot-drop (both of these symptoms are not visible but can be extremely debilitating) would have exhausted me to the point that I would be too fatigued to actually do my shopping.  I understand the frustration of not being able to find a disabled parking spot when one is needed.  However, I choose to assume that anyone with the handicap accessible parking decal has some issue that may or may not be visible, and they are just as entitled to that spot as I am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be careful of assuming someone is not disabled based on their seemingly agile movements for the few seconds that you see them.  Several disabilities are &#8220;invisible&#8221; and may not be obvious when viewing someone for just a few seconds.  I myself have multiple sclerosis and use the handicap accessible parking spaces on a regular basis.  I&#8217;m sure many people have seen me getting out of my car and thought I was parked illegally.  However, were I to park in a &#8220;regular&#8221; spot (perhaps several hundred feet further from the store entrance), the spasticity in my legs and continuous foot-drop (both of these symptoms are not visible but can be extremely debilitating) would have exhausted me to the point that I would be too fatigued to actually do my shopping.  I understand the frustration of not being able to find a disabled parking spot when one is needed.  However, I choose to assume that anyone with the handicap accessible parking decal has some issue that may or may not be visible, and they are just as entitled to that spot as I am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oregon Developmentally Disabled Drivers by Rex Goode</title>
		<link>http://disabilityreviews.org/blog/2009/02/21/oregon-developmentally-disabled-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Goode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilityreviews.org/?p=87#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Hunter,

&quot;No problem&quot; about posting your comments. I&#039;m happy to get any comments in the early stages of this site, and I&#039;ve never been one to stifle disagreements. They make things interesting. I&#039;m trying to decide about your strong language about Mr. McDonald. I usually prefer that people disagree with substance rather than make things personal. 

I see your point and it seems like some history between two people I don&#039;t know. I have been troubled by a lot of the interpretation of policies by local brokerages, especially when they take the same state rules and apply them so differently.

That becomes a sore point with my customers, who see me doing things with their friends that I tell them I can&#039;t do with them. I think the brokerages sometimes forget that our customers often know each other.

Another example of this is that one brokerage in the Portland area will not allow contractors to take customers to the Oregon Coast for inclusion activities and others will. When my customers at the brokerage who won&#039;t hear from customers at brokerages who will, it&#039;s very hard to explain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hunter,</p>
<p>&#8220;No problem&#8221; about posting your comments. I&#8217;m happy to get any comments in the early stages of this site, and I&#8217;ve never been one to stifle disagreements. They make things interesting. I&#8217;m trying to decide about your strong language about Mr. McDonald. I usually prefer that people disagree with substance rather than make things personal. </p>
<p>I see your point and it seems like some history between two people I don&#8217;t know. I have been troubled by a lot of the interpretation of policies by local brokerages, especially when they take the same state rules and apply them so differently.</p>
<p>That becomes a sore point with my customers, who see me doing things with their friends that I tell them I can&#8217;t do with them. I think the brokerages sometimes forget that our customers often know each other.</p>
<p>Another example of this is that one brokerage in the Portland area will not allow contractors to take customers to the Oregon Coast for inclusion activities and others will. When my customers at the brokerage who won&#8217;t hear from customers at brokerages who will, it&#8217;s very hard to explain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oregon Developmentally Disabled Drivers by Hunter McCall</title>
		<link>http://disabilityreviews.org/blog/2009/02/21/oregon-developmentally-disabled-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter McCall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 05:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilityreviews.org/?p=87#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Rex,

I appreciate your response and your willingness to post my remarks in a moderated forum. Even more I appreciate your elucidation of where your professional boundaries lie. I had no issue whatsoever with your original post. I thought it was well thought out and reasonable. It was the saber-rattling that sprung forth in the comments section that put a bee in my bonnet. I think disabilities entitlement programs are a worthy and useful use of tax dollars but I do get tired of one-note polemicists like Mr. McDonald pretending that government money is the solution to every problem and those entities charged as custodians of those dollars are all part of an evil cabal whose life purpose is to deny people with disabilities of services for the pure joy of watching them suffer. I know a whole lot of dedicated people in the disabilities community in Oregon and I&#039;m yet to meet one member of the secret Let&#039;s Screw Over the People with Disabilities club that is the bread and butter of Mr. McDonald&#039;s tireless and useless faux-advocacy. I know incompetent people and deeply gifted people, people who think money is a solution and people who think it can harm more than it helps, but I have yet to meet the diabolical money-grubbing soul sucker who spends his time counting the pieces of gold he&#039;s earned from gleefully stomping on the rights of people with disabilities. It&#039;s a straw man argument that adds nothing to the complex challenges of serving an increasingly diverse and increasingly self-directed population. Thank you for providing a forum for these important discussion.

Yours,
Hunter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rex,</p>
<p>I appreciate your response and your willingness to post my remarks in a moderated forum. Even more I appreciate your elucidation of where your professional boundaries lie. I had no issue whatsoever with your original post. I thought it was well thought out and reasonable. It was the saber-rattling that sprung forth in the comments section that put a bee in my bonnet. I think disabilities entitlement programs are a worthy and useful use of tax dollars but I do get tired of one-note polemicists like Mr. McDonald pretending that government money is the solution to every problem and those entities charged as custodians of those dollars are all part of an evil cabal whose life purpose is to deny people with disabilities of services for the pure joy of watching them suffer. I know a whole lot of dedicated people in the disabilities community in Oregon and I&#8217;m yet to meet one member of the secret Let&#8217;s Screw Over the People with Disabilities club that is the bread and butter of Mr. McDonald&#8217;s tireless and useless faux-advocacy. I know incompetent people and deeply gifted people, people who think money is a solution and people who think it can harm more than it helps, but I have yet to meet the diabolical money-grubbing soul sucker who spends his time counting the pieces of gold he&#8217;s earned from gleefully stomping on the rights of people with disabilities. It&#8217;s a straw man argument that adds nothing to the complex challenges of serving an increasingly diverse and increasingly self-directed population. Thank you for providing a forum for these important discussion.</p>
<p>Yours,<br />
Hunter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

